05 · Responsible AI & governance
Governed automation, with humans in the loop.
The serious commerce buyers we work with are deeply uncomfortable with uncontrolled AI. They worry about hallucinations, brand risk, customer trust, audit, compliance. They should. AI should operate inside governed systems — approval thresholds, confidence floors, audit trails, named owners, reversible actions. The matrix below is how we decide who reviews what.
Model confidence
Low / uncertain
Customer impact
Internal · low
Oversight model
Auto-publish · audit log
High confidence, low impact. Run free, log everything, periodic spot-check.
Oversight model
Human review · before publish
Low confidence, low impact. Drafts queued for staff, brand voice checked.
Customer impact
Customer-facing · high
Oversight model
Human approval · per action
High confidence, customer-facing. Gated behind a named approver.
Oversight model
No autonomous action
Low confidence, customer-facing. AI assists, the human decides.
Every AI action is logged. Every customer-facing action is reversible. Confidence thresholds are set per use case, never globally.
Customer-facing automation gets the highest oversight. Internal-facing assistance — staff drafting, search ranking, anomaly flags — can run lighter. The principle is simple: the further an AI output sits from a human, the more governance has to wrap it.