What was actually wrong.
Most commerce problems are not just front-end problems. They sit between how customers buy, how teams work, and how the systems behind the business behave.
Ox Tools needed an ecommerce platform that could carry trade account ordering, repeat purchase patterns and operational reporting expected by a Builders & trade business.
This was not a brochure storefront. Buyers arriving for a specific item needed enough product information and context to identify it with confidence, while stock, account pricing and purchase history had to support the same buying decision.
Order flow, stock and customer data crossed several back-office systems, so integration boundaries and operational handoffs likely shaped how the platform was built.
Trade buyers and account customers needed account-based pricing, repeat ordering and visibility of their own purchase history without friction.
Account-led buying carries rules that the storefront alone cannot enforce: pricing scope, account hierarchies, repeat-order patterns.
The work had to replace the commerce foundation while preserving the operational logic customers already depended on.
The platform change also depended on product information being structured, enriched and governed well enough to support the catalogue. Product data was a major workstream within the wider commerce delivery, not a separate outcome claim.
What happens if it isn't fixed.
When those gaps are left alone, the website becomes the place where operational problems show up. That can mean unclear data, pricing questions, repeated support queries and customers who cannot complete the job they came to do.
When account-based pricing, repeat ordering and purchase-history visibility slip, trade and account customers lose confidence in the site and push work back onto sales and support.
Most relevant to Builders & trade teams running B2B, D2C and trade-account operations and weighing similar platform decisions.
If catalogue and operational data drift, buyers can lose confidence in product information, pricing, stock and purchase history. That can delay or abandon an order, while internal teams absorb the uncertainty through manual checking and customer service.
For repeat buyers and trade accounts, uncertainty creates friction every time an order is placed again. Wrong-part risk, unclear account terms and a harder repeat-order path can frustrate buyers and move the burden back to account teams and support.
Trade accounts do not give second chances. A bad first experience pushes the order to a competitor and the relationship rarely comes back.
Five things, in order.
Delivery is not just a list of features. The order matters, because the wrong sequence can turn technical dependencies into business risk.
- 01Mapped the buying journey before the interfaceStarted with how customers actually order here: account relationships, repeat-buy patterns and the operational context behind each purchase.
- 02Rebuilt the commerce foundation around how the business operatesRebuilt the commerce foundation around the operational logic the business already depended on, without resetting what already worked.
- 03Brought product data into one governed workstreamProduct information, enrichment and catalogue structure were treated as a delivery workstream that enabled the commerce change. Technical data and downloads had to remain connected to the product context buyers used to identify the right item.
- 04Scoped the rules per audience, not per platformAccount-led ordering and self-serve buying were shaped as distinct journeys on the same foundation.
- 05Moved the project into support with the operating context intactHandover preserved the operational decisions made during build, so support could keep moving the platform forward without re-learning the business.
Systems, one operational truth.
Where this could have gone wrong.
Measurable, not adjectival.
The useful proof is not a bigger adjective. It is the project shape, the systems involved, the trading model supported and, where available, the numbers recorded from the work.
What the client said.
A client quote should support the case study, not carry it. The project story still needs to stay grounded in the work that was delivered.
Fantastic partner to work with. Together, we reimagined the user journey, ensuring that it was easy to access critical pages like the my account, PDP and PLPs. iWeb created an engaging tool selection page, providing the user personalised recommendations for tools based on their preferences.”
What moved into support.
A project like this does not stop mattering at launch. The same catalogue, account, integration and trading logic has to keep working once real customers and internal teams are using it.
The project did not end when the platform went live.
Support mattered because the builders and trade still depended on parts data, pricing imports, account behaviour, inventory feeds, integrations and customer-facing information after launch.
Keeping the build decisions and system ownership visible gave the support team a clearer basis for tracing issues and maintaining the connected trading system after launch.
Surfaces from the live project.
These screens show where the operational work becomes part of the customer, account buyer or internal team experience.
Projects with a similar shape.
A construction supplies commerce platform rebuilt around trade purchasing and product depth.
Trade product complexity handled through a faster, more effective ecommerce experience.
A timber merchant platform rebuilt around trade ordering, mobile engagement and customer experience.
Timber trading supported by stronger mobile activity, engagement and a clearer customer experience.
A cable management commerce platform built around specialist products, availability and trade purchasing.
Specialist electrical product sales supported by stronger mobile purchasing and faster catalogue scope.