Skip to main content
Talk to an expert
Work/Yuasa & Halfords
ReplatformAutomotive & partsCW-062-RP-AU

Yuasa & Halfords: rebuilding battery product and parts commerce around catalogue depth.

A 2-month replatform for battery product and parts commerce, shaped around catalogue depth, catalogue governance, technical product information, stock and pricing logic and B2B and D2C buying.

Yuasa & Halfords's operating scale meant the commerce platform had to support specialist catalogue depth, product information and operational systems without losing customer confidence or continuity.

2
Month project
Kickoff to go-live
2
Platforms
Adobe Commerce and Word Press CMS
1
System integration
Microsoft Dynamics ERP
2
Commerce models
B2B and D2C
Read onWhat was actually wrong, what we did, and what could have gone wrong.
02
The problem

What was actually wrong.

Most commerce problems are not just front-end problems. They sit between how customers buy, how teams work, and how the systems behind the business behave.

Yuasa & Halfords needed an ecommerce platform that could carry trade account ordering, repeat purchase patterns and operational reporting expected by a Automotive & parts business.

This was not a generic parts storefront. Battery specifications, application compatibility, technical downloads, stock and pricing had to support a dependable product decision.

Order flow, stock and customer data crossed several back-office systems, so integration boundaries and operational handoffs likely shaped how the platform was built.

Trade buyers and account customers needed account-based pricing, repeat ordering and visibility of their own purchase history without friction.

Battery selection depends on application-specific product data. Buyers need technical specifications, compatibility information and catalogue structure that distinguish the correct battery for the vehicle or equipment in front of them.

Stock was not one flat number. Depot location, availability and fulfilment context had to remain meaningful so customers and order teams could rely on what the platform showed.

Account-led buying carries rules that the storefront alone cannot enforce: pricing scope, account hierarchies, repeat-order patterns.

The platform change also depended on product information being structured, enriched and governed well enough to support the catalogue. Product data was a major workstream within the wider commerce delivery, not a separate outcome claim.

03
The risk

What happens if it isn't fixed.

When those gaps are left alone, the website becomes the place where operational problems show up. That can mean unclear data, pricing questions, repeated support queries and customers who cannot complete the job they came to do.

When account-based pricing, repeat ordering and purchase-history visibility slip, trade and account customers lose confidence in the site and push work back onto sales and support.

Most relevant to Automotive & parts teams running B2B and D2C operations and weighing similar platform decisions.

If battery specifications, compatibility, price or availability drift, buyers can select the wrong product or return to manual support for confirmation. The catalogue has to carry enough technical depth to make that decision dependable.

For repeat buyers and trade accounts, uncertainty creates friction every time an order is placed again. Wrong-part risk, unclear account terms and a harder repeat-order path can frustrate buyers and move the burden back to account teams and support.

Once a buying habit moves elsewhere it is expensive to win back. The consequence of inaction is not dramatic; it is cumulative.

04
The work

Five things, in order.

Delivery is not just a list of features. The order matters, because the wrong sequence can turn technical dependencies into business risk.

  1. 01
    Mapped the buying journey before the interface
    Started with how customers actually order here: account relationships, repeat-buy patterns and the operational context behind each purchase.
  2. 02
    Rebuilt the commerce foundation around how the business operates
    Rebuilt the commerce foundation around the operational logic the business already depended on, without resetting what already worked.
  3. 03
    Brought product data into one governed workstream
    Product information, enrichment and catalogue structure were treated as a delivery workstream that enabled the commerce change. Technical data and downloads had to remain connected to the product context buyers used to identify the right item.
  4. 04
    Scoped the rules per audience, not per platform
    Account-led ordering and self-serve buying were shaped as distinct journeys on the same foundation. Local catalogue, depot, inventory, delivery and pricing rules had to remain coherent for the buyer context in front of the screen.
  5. 05
    Moved the project into support with the operating context intact
    Handover preserved the operational decisions made during build, so support could keep moving the platform forward without re-learning the business.
05
Systems

Systems, one operational truth.

The customer-facing platform was one part of the operating system. The project also depended on operational data, product information, inventory and communication systems, with clear boundaries for what each one supported and what customers could rely on.
Adobe Commerce (Powered by Magento)
Customer-facing commerce platform
Provided the customer-facing commerce platform for catalogue, account and ordering journeys. The platform could only present information it received from the operational and product systems around it. It mattered because a mismatch could become visible through product, account, stock or order information.
Microsoft Dynamics ERP
Operational business data system
Provided operational context for account, order, pricing and fulfilment data used by the commerce experience. Commerce depended on an agreed boundary between ERP-held business data and the customer-facing platform. It mattered because a mismatch could become visible through product, account, stock or order information.
Word Press CMS
Experience platform
Supported the experience and content layer within the project platform stack. Its boundary with commerce and connected content flows needed to remain clear. It mattered because a mismatch could become visible through product, account, stock or order information.
06
Risk control

Where this could have gone wrong.

Difficult parts of a project need to be named early. That gives the team a shared view of the risks, the decisions needed, and the areas that cannot be left vague.
ERP dependency
Account, order, pricing and fulfilment data depended on the ERP boundary. A stale or ambiguous hand-off could surface as the wrong account context, order state or delivery expectation. How we held it: Define which operational fields the ERP owns, how commerce consumes them and how failed or delayed exchanges are identified before they affect an order.
Platform maintainability
Commerce and digital experience capabilities sat across more than one platform. Unclear boundaries could make routine change harder and allow overlapping ownership to create inconsistent behaviour. How we held it: Keep platform responsibilities explicit, document the joins and carry those decisions into support so future changes do not reopen settled architecture questions.
Account ordering
B2B and direct buying shared a platform, but account hierarchies, purchase history, documents, pricing and order paths could differ sharply by buyer. How we held it: Model account relationships and permissions explicitly, then test repeat-order and self-serve journeys against the correct customer, price and document context.
Product information
Catalogue structure, technical content and operational product data could move at different cadences. Drift risks putting incomplete, inconsistent or misleading information in front of a buyer choosing a specific item. How we held it: Separate ownership for product content, technical data, stock and price, then make each storefront dependency visible and reviewable through the product journey.
Timeline
The recorded project length set a fixed delivery context for a broad platform and integration scope. How we held it: Sequence decisions around the highest operational dependencies and flag any scope trade-off for editorial review rather than claiming an undocumented method.
Stock and pricing
Availability and price could vary by account, catalogue, depot or inventory source. A flattened view risks presenting a value that is technically current but wrong for the buyer in front of it. How we held it: Preserve the buyer and location context behind stock and pricing, define the source for each value and test how fallbacks behave when an operational update is late.
Support ownership
After launch, unclear ownership across parts data, pricing imports, inventory feeds and account behaviour could make operational faults slower to understand and resolve. How we held it: Carry the system boundaries, data ownership and recovery decisions into support so the team inherits the operating model as well as the platform.
07
Outcome

Measurable, not adjectival.

The useful proof is not a bigger adjective. It is the project shape, the systems involved, the trading model supported and, where available, the numbers recorded from the work.

2
Month project
Kickoff to go-live
+145%
Improved product data quality
Improvement recorded after launch
1x
System integration
Microsoft Dynamics ERP
-47%
Reduction in capital investment
Reduction recorded in the source data
2x
Platforms
Adobe Commerce and Word Press CMS
25x
Managing complexity
Improvement recorded after launch
08
In their words

What the client said.

A client quote should support the case study, not carry it. The project story still needs to stay grounded in the work that was delivered.

iWeb have integrated critical functionality for us like vehicle and battery lookup, vehicle registration lookup, online CPD training resources, and a rich CMS experience. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend them.
James Douglas, Marketing Manager, GS Yuasa
09
After launch

What moved into support.

A project like this does not stop mattering at launch. The same catalogue, account, integration and trading logic has to keep working once real customers and internal teams are using it.

The project did not end when the platform went live.

Support mattered because the battery product and parts commerce still depended on parts data, pricing imports, account behaviour, inventory feeds, integrations and customer-facing information after launch.

Keeping the build decisions and system ownership visible gave the support team a clearer basis for tracing issues and maintaining the connected trading system after launch.

Next step

A project that looks like this one?

Send us the brief. You'll get a written response from a senior expert, usually within two working days.
Talk to an expertOr see all work →