Skip to main content
Talk to an expert
Google Pub/Sub logo

Google Pub/Sub integration for ecommerce reporting

Event-driven analytics connecting your estate without building bridges Google Pub/Sub decouples commerce, ERP, PIM and warehouse so data flows asynchronously with ordering guarantees and fault tolerance. iWeb designs schemas, builds subscribers and operates monitoring so your warehouse stays fresh and new analytics platforms can plug in without touching source systems. Works with Adobe Commerce, Magento Open Source, Shopify Plus, BigCommerce and other storefronts.

Also searched as: reporting integration, analytics connector, API link, extension.

Google Pub/SubiWeb integration layeryour storefront
Works with - Adobe Commerce · Magento Open Source · BigCommerce · Shopify Plus · Other storefronts
01 · What you get

What a Google Pub/Sub integration gives you.

Real-time analytics without replatforming

Your data warehouse stays current without building and maintaining ETL batch jobs. Events land within seconds, so dashboards and models reflect live business state.

Reduced coupling between commerce and systems

New data consumers (BI tools, marketing platforms, recommendation engines) can subscribe to events without requiring changes to the source systems or checkout flow.

Audit trail and compliance by design

All data changes flow through Pub/Sub topics, creating an immutable log for regulatory enquiries, GDPR requests and dispute resolution.

Fault tolerance and fallback during outages

If a downstream system goes down, events queue in Pub/Sub. When the consumer recovers, it processes the backlog without losing data or requiring manual replay.

Scalable analytics without bottlenecks

Pub/Sub auto-scales to handle peak traffic (Black Friday, flash sales) without impacting checkout performance or requiring manual capacity planning.

02 · When it's worth it

Where a Google Pub/Sub integration earns its place.

If two or more of these are true, the integration usually pays for itself quickly.

Stream commerce events into a data warehouse for real-time analytics
Publish order, customer and inventory events to a CDP or reverse-ETL platform
Buffer high-volume catalogue or pricing updates during peak traffic
Feed ERP, PIM and search events into a unified event log for audit and replay
Decouple synchronous checkouts from asynchronous downstream processing
03 · The limits

Where off-the-shelf connectors fall short.

Vendor connectors are fine for simple cases. Here's where the real ones need more.

No native schema registry or governance

Pub/Sub does not enforce data contracts or schema evolution rules. Event producers can change message format without warning, causing downstream parsing failures and data quality drift in the warehouse.

Stateless ordering within a topic

Messages are ordered within a partition key, but Pub/Sub does not guarantee global order across all messages in a topic. Events arriving out of order can corrupt state in analytics models and CDP segments.

No built-in data lineage or impact analysis

When a schema changes or a message is dropped, there is no automatic way to see which downstream dashboards, models or segments are affected. Engineers must manually trace dependencies.

Limited replay and time-travel capability

Pub/Sub retains messages for a configurable window (default 7 days). Recovering lost or corrupted data beyond that window requires external backup; rebuilding a warehouse table requires re-running historical extracts from source systems.

No native transformation or filtering

Pub/Sub is a pure message broker; it does not enrich, deduplicate or transform events. Custom logic must live in subscriber applications, leading to code duplication and maintenance burden across multiple consumers.

04 · The real work

Data pipelines built with direct API calls break when systems are slow or down; event brokers decouple producers from consumers and let new analytics platforms plug in without touching the source code.

05 · Where it sits

Where this integration sits in your estate.

Google Pub/Sub holds the commercial record. The iWeb integration layer manages the rules, mappings, monitoring and exceptions. The commerce platform presents the customer-facing experience. The estate map helps agree ownership before anything is built.

No platform lock-in. We integrate Google Pub/Sub with the commerce core you already have, or the one you are moving to.

System of record
Source / owner
Google Pub/Sub
Asynchronous message broker and event hub for data pipelines
  • Topic schemas and event contracts
  • Message partitioning and ordering guarantees
  • Retention windows and replay capability
  • Dead-letter queues for failed messages
  • Subscription management and consumer tracking
iWeb integration layer
Customer-facing commerce
Commerce platform
Adobe CommerceMagento Open SourceBigCommerceShopify PlusOther storefronts
  • Commerce platform event generation (orders, customers, carts)
  • Checkout and transactional processing
  • Customer and product catalogue data
  • Live pricing and stock availability
  • Payment processing and reconciliation
Connected neighbours
Integration layer
ERP system
Source of order, inventory and customer master data; producer of events into Pub/Sub
Integration layer
Data warehouse
Primary consumer of events; landing tables populated by Pub/Sub subscribers
Integration layer
PIM
Source of catalogue and attribute events; feeds search indexing and channel connectors via Pub/Sub
Integration layer
CDP or marketing platform
Consumer of behavioural and customer events; source of reverse-ETL segments back through Pub/Sub
Integration layer
BI and analytics platform
Consumes modelled warehouse tables built from Pub/Sub events
Integration layer
Search and recommendation engine
Consumer of catalogue feed events from Pub/Sub
Two-way sync where relevant
06 · Surrounding systems

Systems this integration usually sits next to.

Examples, not a closed list. iWeb is platform-agnostic on both sides: we wire this integration into whatever ecommerce platform and surrounding systems your estate already runs.

Ecommerce platforms (examples)
  • Adobe Commerce
  • Magento Open Source
  • BigCommerce
  • Shopify Plus
  • Other storefronts
Surrounding systems (examples)
  • Data warehouse (BigQuery, Snowflake, Redshift)
  • ERP (SAP, NetSuite, Infor)
  • PIM (Salsify, Informatica, Inriver)
  • CDP or marketing platform (mParticle, Segment, Tealium)
  • Search and merchandising platform
  • Business intelligence and reporting tool
  • Analytics and event tracking layer
Not sure?

Not sure if this works with your stack?

Tell us what you’re using and what needs to connect. We’ll give you a straight view on what’s possible, what might be awkward, and the safest way to approach it.

07 · Data flows

The data flows we wire.

Each flow has a direction and an owner. We agree both before a line of code is written.

From OTHER SYSTEMS
BOTH WAYS
Commerce and ERP events to warehouse: Orders, customer profiles, inventory movements and catalogue updates flow from commerce platforms and ERP systems into Pub/Sub topics
Subscribers consume these events and land them into a data warehouse or data lake for modelling, analytics and historical analysis.
Behavioural and transactional events to CDP: Browse events, cart abandonments, purchases and customer account changes stream into Pub/Sub and are consumed by a CDP or marketing platform
This enables audience building, campaign triggering and segmentation based on fresh data.
Catalogue and pricing feeds to indexing systems: Product attribute updates, category taxonomy changes and bulk pricing revisions arrive via Pub/Sub and feed downstream search indexing, recommendation engines or channel connectors that need to stay in sync.
Reverse-ETL of curated segments back to commerce: Modelled audiences and enriched customer attributes computed in the warehouse are published back through Pub/Sub to commerce platforms, CRM systems or ad platforms for personalisation and targeting.
Audit and compliance event log: All significant events across the estate flow through Pub/Sub into a compliance topic for long-term retention
This creates an immutable record of data changes, user actions and system state for audit, GDPR and regulatory enquiries.
08 · How we build it

How iWeb configures the integration around your business.

Same method on every integration. The decisions come before the code.

  1. 01
    Design event schemas and contracts

    We define topic schemas, field naming conventions and versioning rules, then document them so all teams know what events exist and how to consume them. This prevents schema drift and reduces parsing errors downstream.

  2. 02
    Build and operate subscriber applications

    We write the consumer code that transforms raw events into warehouse tables, CDP records or campaign triggers. We handle deduplication, ordering and failure scenarios so your data stays consistent.

  3. 03
    Integrate with your ERP, PIM and commerce platforms

    We build the producers that capture events from your order, inventory, product and customer systems and publish them to Pub/Sub. We tune batch sizes, rate limiting and retries to avoid overloading source systems.

  4. 04
    Implement monitoring and alerting

    We instrument topics with lag monitoring, error rate dashboards and dead-letter queue alerts. We ensure failures are visible in real time and investigations can begin immediately.

  5. 05
    Plan and execute data migrations

    We design replay and backfill strategies when you add new consumers or move to Pub/Sub from a batch architecture. We ensure historical data and new events are both available to new subscribers.

09 · Ownership

Who owns what.

The single most important table in any integration. One system owns each field; everything else reads it.

Data
Source / owner
Maintained by
Notes
DataSource system extracts (orders, inventory, catalogue, customers)
Source / ownerERP, commerce platform, PIM
Maintained byiWeb, with source system teams
NotesProducers are built and deployed by iWeb; source teams ensure systems are healthy and APIs are available.
DataEvent schemas and data contracts
Source / ownerPub/Sub topic definitions and documentation
Maintained byiWeb data architecture team
NotesSchemas are versioned and reviewed before producer or subscriber changes are deployed.
DataWarehouse landing tables and modelled views
Source / ownerData warehouse
Maintained byiWeb analytics team, with business owners
NotesSubscribers populate landing tables; warehouse teams own model logic and aggregates.
DataTopic retention, lag and error alerting
Source / ownerPub/Sub topic configuration and Cloud Monitoring
Maintained byiWeb data operations
NotesRetention windows are set based on replay requirements; alerts are tuned with warehouse and systems teams.
DataReverse-ETL segments and audience exports
Source / ownerCDP or marketing platform
Maintained byiWeb, with marketing and CRM teams
NotesCurated segments computed in the warehouse are published back through Pub/Sub to activation systems.
DataCompliance and audit event log
Source / ownerPub/Sub compliance topic and long-term archive
Maintained byiWeb, with compliance and legal teams
NotesAll estate events flow into a compliance topic with separate retention rules and access controls.
10 · Experienced integrator

Built event pipelines like this

iWeb has designed and operated event-driven data architectures where commerce, ERP, PIM and warehouse systems communicate asynchronously via Pub/Sub. We understand how to handle schema governance, deduplication, ordering and consumer lag in high-volume estates.

We design event schemas and data contracts that prevent drift and allow versioning without breaking consumers
We build subscriber applications and data pipelines that handle duplicates, ordering and replay scenarios correctly
We instrument topics with lag monitoring, error rate dashboards and dead-letter queue alerts so failures surface immediately
We have integrated Pub/Sub with SAP, NetSuite, Infor, Salesforce and Workday systems to feed ERP events into warehouses
We tune partition keys, batching and retention windows to balance ordering guarantees with cost and replay capability
11 · Before launch

What we test before launch.

Every one of these is rehearsed before a customer ever sees the integration.

Verify event schemas are validated on publish and consume, and dead-letter queues surface parsing failures within one hour
Confirm subscriber lag monitoring alerts when a consumer falls more than two hours behind, before data is lost to retention expiry
Test that duplicate messages are detected and idempotent: running the same event twice does not inflate counts in the warehouse
Validate that ordering within partition keys is preserved, and out-of-order events within a key trigger a failure alert
Confirm that when a subscriber is stopped, messages queue in Pub/Sub and are processed in order when it restarts
Test cost monitoring and budget alerts for message volume and storage to prevent unexpected bills
Verify that replay of historical events (older than retention window) can be triggered by re-extracting from source systems
12 · Failure points

Common risks and where they bite.

We name these on day one. A risk written down is a risk you can plan around.

Schema changes break downstream subscribers silently

A producer adds a new field to an event or removes an optional field. Subscribers that expect the old schema fail to parse the message and drop it into a dead-letter queue, going unnoticed for hours. Dashboard queries then return incomplete results.

Duplicate events corrupt data models

A producer retries a failed publish, or a subscriber re-processes a message after a crash. The warehouse table receives two copies of the same order or customer record, inflating revenue or contact counts.

Out-of-order events produce incorrect aggregates

An order event arrives before its payment confirmation, or a customer update follows a transaction that should have used the old address. Aggregations computed from the sequence produce wrong totals or states.

Consumer lag grows undetected during incidents

A downstream service goes down (warehouse unavailable, CDP API rate-limited). Events queue in Pub/Sub, but no one monitors the lag metric. By the time the issue is noticed, days of backlog accumulate and replay takes hours.

Retention window expires before failures are noticed

A bug in a subscriber causes it to crash and stay down for 10 days. After that window, messages are purged from Pub/Sub. The consumer cannot replay lost data, so the warehouse has a 10-day gap that must be filled by re-running historical extracts.

Cost explosion from high-volume or unbounded topics

A new event source publishes at unexpectedly high volume, or a subscriber fails and begins reprocessing every message in the topic. Pub/Sub charges per message; the bill spikes without warning and engineering is not alerted.

14 · Questions

Common questions about Google Pub/Sub integrations.

What is the difference between Pub/Sub and direct API integrations?

Direct APIs are synchronous point-to-point connections (checkout calls ERP, ERP calls warehouse). Pub/Sub is asynchronous and decoupled: a producer publishes an event, subscribers consume it independently. If a subscriber is slow or down, the producer is not blocked. New consumers can be added without changing the producer.

How do we ensure data quality and catch schema mismatches?

We define formal event schemas and publish them to a shared registry. Producers validate events against the schema before publishing; subscribers validate on consume. We set up dead-letter queues to catch unparseable messages and monitor them daily. Breaking schema changes are caught in staging before reaching production.

What happens when a subscriber crashes or falls behind?

Messages stay in the Pub/Sub topic for the configured retention window (we typically set 7-14 days for commerce estates). When the subscriber comes back online, it processes the backlog in order. If it is down longer than the retention window, we re-run historical extracts from the source systems to fill the gap.

How do we handle duplicate messages and ensure idempotency?

Pub/Sub guarantees at-least-once delivery; duplicates can happen. We include a unique event ID in every message and have subscribers check for duplicates before writing to the warehouse (using a deduplication table or unique constraints). This ensures the same event never inflates a count, even if Pub/Sub delivers it twice.

Can we replay historical data through Pub/Sub?

Pub/Sub retains messages for the configured window. If you need data older than that, we re-run historical extracts from the source systems and publish them as catch-up events. For new subscribers, we can bulk-load historical data directly into the warehouse before connecting the live topic.

How does Pub/Sub handle ordering of events?

Pub/Sub orders messages within a partition key (e.g., order ID or customer ID), but not globally across all messages. We design partition keys so related events arrive in order. For events that must be strictly ordered across the entire topic, we handle ordering in the subscriber application.

What monitoring and alerting do you set up?

We monitor topic lag (how far behind each subscriber is), error rates, message volume and retention window usage. We alert on lag spikes (subscriber is falling behind), error rate changes and topics approaching retention expiry. Dashboards show which subscribers are healthy and which need attention.

How much does Pub/Sub cost, and how do we control it?

Pub/Sub charges per message published and per GB of retained data. We monitor volume and set up budget alerts. We compress messages, drop non-essential fields and tune retention windows to keep costs predictable. For high-volume topics, we discuss batch publishing and filtering strategies.

How do we integrate Pub/Sub with our data warehouse?

We build subscriber applications (on Cloud Run, Cloud Functions or Dataflow) that consume Pub/Sub messages and write them to BigQuery, Snowflake or your warehouse. We handle batching, partitioning and incremental updates so the warehouse stays in sync without duplicate or delayed data.

Can Pub/Sub feed data to multiple destinations (warehouse, CDP, search index)?

Yes. One producer publishes to a Pub/Sub topic; multiple subscribers consume it independently. One subscriber might write to the warehouse, another to your CDP, a third to a search index. Each consumer operates at its own pace without blocking the others.

How do we maintain data lineage and impact analysis?

We document which systems produce events, which topics they publish to, which subscribers consume them and what downstream tables and dashboards depend on them. We maintain a data lineage diagram in a wiki or metadata catalogue so teams can see the path from source to BI.

What happens if Google Pub/Sub has an outage?

Pub/Sub is a managed service with a high SLA. If it does have an outage, events queue on the producer side (we implement buffering and retries). When Pub/Sub recovers, the queue drains automatically. For critical real-time flows, we can architect dual-write strategies or regional failover.

How do we handle compliance and GDPR requests with Pub/Sub?

We route all data changes through compliance topics with audit logging enabled. For GDPR deletion requests, we have workflows to identify affected events in the log and purge them from the warehouse. The immutable event log provides a complete audit trail for regulatory investigations.

Can we transform or filter events in Pub/Sub itself?

Pub/Sub is a pure broker; it does not transform messages. Transformation happens in subscriber applications. We build lightweight transformers (field mapping, deduplication, filtering) in Cloud Functions or Dataflow that sit between Pub/Sub and the warehouse, keeping the logic visible and testable.

Next step

Have a Google Pub/Sub integration brief?

Send the brief, or tell us what is breaking. You will get a written response from a senior expert: the integration boundary, the realistic shape, the risks worth naming, and what it takes to support after launch.
Talk to an expertOr browse all integrations →