Core capabilities
How this platform fits the wider commerce estate.
Questions we get asked.
What is Adaptive Commerce° in one sentence?
An AI-first commerce platform built by WithPraxis.ai that understands your business, predicts customer needs, and adapts operations automatically, delivered with iWeb as the engineering partner.
Does Adaptive Commerce° replace my ecommerce platform?
No. It runs alongside your commerce platform, PIM, and ERP. The commerce engine still does what it does best; the intelligence, governance, and decision work happens in Adaptive Commerce°.
How is WithPraxis.ai different from iWeb?
WithPraxis.ai brings the AI platform, operating model, and governance work. iWeb brings the commerce systems, integrations, and engineering. Clients get intelligence and execution under one delivery plan.
Is Adaptive Commerce° suitable for B2B trade?
Yes. The framework is shaped by merchants who run depots, branches, complex price lists, and ERP-bound pricing. B2B trade behaviour including quote-to-cart, partial dispatch, and contract pricing is central to the design.
When is Adaptive Commerce° not the right fit?
When the operation is simple enough that a standard build does the job. iWeb will say so and recommend the simpler path; not every merchant needs Adaptive Commerce°.
Is there direct case-study proof for Adaptive Commerce° as a named framework?
The framework is recent. The projects on this page are governed iWeb engagements with comparable complexity, listed as adjacent reference rather than direct Adaptive Commerce° proof.
How does iWeb choose between platforms?
Against operational shape: catalogue depth, trade complexity, ERP integration, multi-territory rules and five-year cost. The decision is written down with trade-offs, not assumed from a vendor demo.
Where does ERP integration sit in the platform decision?
It is a primary input. Some platforms make ERP integration straightforward, some make it expensive. iWeb names the trade-off rather than hiding it.
Does iWeb deliver headless or composable storefronts?
Where they earn their place. The trade-off between optionality and integration surface is named upfront; composable is not a default.
How is search handled on this platform?
Native search where the query mix supports it; specialist engines (Algolia, Constructor.io) where the catalogue, volume or merchandising appetite justify them. Relevance is a continuous activity.
Where does PIM sit relative to the commerce platform?
PIM owns catalogue truth (attributes, variants, assets, channel readiness). The commerce platform reads from PIM rather than re-modelling deep product data in the storefront.
Can iWeb take over an existing build on this platform?
Yes, where the brief fits. iWeb will give a senior, written read on what is working, what needs remediation and what is honestly fixable, and the first month on support stays deliberately conservative on change.




