Where Centra fits and where it does not
How this platform fits the wider commerce estate.
Questions we get asked.
Does iWeb deliver Centra builds?
iWeb works alongside Centra merchants on the wider estate (PIM, ERP boundaries, operational systems). Net-new Centra storefront delivery is not iWeb's primary shape; the team will be honest about that on first conversation.
When is Centra the right fit?
For fashion and lifestyle brands where the product shape matches the platform and wholesale sits alongside D2C. For trade and B2B-heavy operating models, other platforms usually fit more cleanly.
How does Centra handle wholesale?
Natively, alongside D2C in the same catalogue and stock model. The design work is in pricing rules, customer groups and channel governance.
Does Centra need a separate PIM?
For deep catalogue and asset governance, yes. Akeneo or Salsify behind Centra keeps the boundary clean. For small catalogues the native model is often enough.
Where does ERP sit relative to Centra?
ERP owns commercial data, pricing and stock. Centra reads the boundary via APIs. The integration boundary is the most important architecture decision.
How does iWeb choose between platforms?
Against operational shape: catalogue depth, trade complexity, ERP integration, multi-territory rules and five-year cost. The decision is written down with trade-offs, not assumed from a vendor demo.
Where does ERP integration sit in the platform decision?
It is a primary input. Some platforms make ERP integration straightforward, some make it expensive. iWeb names the trade-off rather than hiding it.
Does iWeb deliver headless or composable storefronts?
Where they earn their place. The trade-off between optionality and integration surface is named upfront; composable is not a default.
How is search handled on this platform?
Native search where the query mix supports it; specialist engines (Algolia, Constructor.io) where the catalogue, volume or merchandising appetite justify them. Relevance is a continuous activity.
Where does PIM sit relative to the commerce platform?
PIM owns catalogue truth (attributes, variants, assets, channel readiness). The commerce platform reads from PIM rather than re-modelling deep product data in the storefront.
Can iWeb take over an existing build on this platform?
Yes, where the brief fits. iWeb will give a senior, written read on what is working, what needs remediation and what is honestly fixable, and the first month on support stays deliberately conservative on change.
How does iWeb size a five-year total cost picture?
Licence, hosting, engineering and support across the lifecycle, including the integration surface and operational ownership. The headline year-one number is rarely the honest comparison.




