Where Hyvä fits inside an Adobe Commerce estate
How this platform fits the wider commerce estate.
Questions we get asked.
Is Hyvä a replacement for Adobe Commerce?
No. Hyvä replaces the storefront frontend. Adobe Commerce still runs catalogue, checkout core and admin. The decision is about the storefront layer, not the platform.
What performance gain is realistic from Hyvä?
Real Core Web Vitals improvement is typical when the rest of the stack co-operates. iWeb measures the gain against real buying journeys, not synthetic homepages, so the number is honest.
Do existing Magento extensions still work?
Many need a Hyvä-compatible variant or replacement. iWeb maps that work before recommending a rebuild; surprise extension work is the most common Hyvä project risk.
Should I add Hyvä Checkout at the same time?
Sometimes. Hyvä Checkout and the wider Hyvä Commerce surface trade faster delivery against giving up some Magento extension behaviour. The decision is scoped per merchant.
Will Hyvä fix a slow site by itself?
Only if the slowness lives in the storefront. If the catalogue, integrations or ERP are the bottleneck, Hyvä will not help; iWeb will say so.
How does iWeb choose between platforms?
Against operational shape: catalogue depth, trade complexity, ERP integration, multi-territory rules and five-year cost. The decision is written down with trade-offs, not assumed from a vendor demo.
Where does ERP integration sit in the platform decision?
It is a primary input. Some platforms make ERP integration straightforward, some make it expensive. iWeb names the trade-off rather than hiding it.
Does iWeb deliver headless or composable storefronts?
Where they earn their place. The trade-off between optionality and integration surface is named upfront; composable is not a default.
How is search handled on this platform?
Native search where the query mix supports it; specialist engines (Algolia, Constructor.io) where the catalogue, volume or merchandising appetite justify them. Relevance is a continuous activity.
Where does PIM sit relative to the commerce platform?
PIM owns catalogue truth (attributes, variants, assets, channel readiness). The commerce platform reads from PIM rather than re-modelling deep product data in the storefront.
Can iWeb take over an existing build on this platform?
Yes, where the brief fits. iWeb will give a senior, written read on what is working, what needs remediation and what is honestly fixable, and the first month on support stays deliberately conservative on change.
How does iWeb size a five-year total cost picture?
Licence, hosting, engineering and support across the lifecycle, including the integration surface and operational ownership. The headline year-one number is rarely the honest comparison.




