Where wider sector experience fits
How wider sector experience fits iWeb engagements.
Questions we get asked.
When does a sector outside the six core specialisms still fit iWeb?
When the operational shape matches: B2B trade, complex catalogue, ERP-integrated commerce or mixed B2B / B2C. The decision is on the brief, not on the sector tag.
Which commerce platforms come up in wider-sector work?
Mostly Adobe Commerce and Magento, where the team has direct project experience. The operational patterns apply on other commerce platforms where the architecture and project evidence support it.
Which systems usually matter outside the core sectors?
The same ones: a PIM where catalogue complexity warrants it, an ERP for pricing, stock and accounts, and an OMS / WMS where fulfilment crosses multiple locations.
What is iWeb cautious about taking on outside the core sectors?
Briefs where the operational shape is unfamiliar and the timeline does not allow for proper discovery. The team will say so rather than overcommit.
Which trading models suit iWeb outside the six core sectors?
B2B trade, mixed B2B / B2C, ERP-integrated commerce and complex catalogue operations. The decision is on the shape of the brief, not the sector tag.
How does iWeb approach a sector it has less direct proof in?
Discovery first. The operational shape is mapped against the patterns iWeb already runs, and any gaps are named openly. The team will say so when evidence does not exist, rather than borrow it.
Do you have proof outside the six core sectors?
Yes. The work archive lists projects across a wider set of sectors than the six core specialisms. Where a project is not public, iWeb can walk through it under NDA.
Are search, PIM and ERP patterns the same outside the core sectors?
Yes. The boundary between ERP, PIM, search and commerce is the same regardless of sector. What changes is which flows are heavy, not the architecture.
Can iWeb take over an existing build in an unfamiliar sector?
Yes. The team reads the codebase, integrations and incident history first, then writes down what to keep, stabilise or change. The first month on support is deliberately conservative on change.
How is pricing approached for less common sectors?
The same way as for the core sectors. iWeb brackets cost against the integration scope, the data complexity and the support model rather than the sector tag.
Will iWeb take on work outside the six core sectors?
Yes, where the engagement fits the team's strengths and the operational shape (catalogue, ERP integration, trade behaviour, multi-territory) matches. The decision is on the merits of the brief, not on a sector tag.
Does iWeb invent sector proof to fill a landing page?
No. Sector proof surfaces only through governed case studies, and only when those case studies are direct or honestly adjacent. Pages do not exist as a sector-roll-call exercise.





